PAPERS ON HINDUISM
To the Hindu, at that point, the entire universe of religions is just a voyaging, a coming up, of various people, through different conditions and conditions, to a similar objective. Each religion is just developing a God out of the material man, and a similar God is the inspirer of every one of them. Why, at that point, are there such a significant number of logical inconsistencies? They are just evident, says the Hindu.
The logical inconsistencies originate from a similar truth adjusting to the shifting conditions of various natures.
It is a similar light coming through glasses of various hues. What’s more, these little varieties are important for motivations behind adjustment. Be that as it may, in the core of everything similar truth rules. The Lord has announced to the Hindu in His manifestation as Krishna, “I am in each religion as the string through a pearl necklace. Wherever thou seest uncommon sacredness and unprecedented power raising and cleansing humankind, know thou that I am there.” And what has been the outcome? I challenge the world to discover, all through the entire arrangement of Sanskrit theory, any such articulation as that the Hindu alone will be spared and not others. “Says Vyasa, “We find admire men even past the pale of our position and proclamation of confidence.” One thing more.” One thing more. How, at that point, can the Hindu, whose entire texture of thought focuses on God, put stock in Buddhism which is the skeptic, or in Jainism which is agnostic?
The Buddhists or the Jains don’t rely on God; yet the entire power of their religion is coordinated to the colossal focal truth in each religion, to advance a God out of the man. They have not seen the Father, but rather they have seen the Son. What’s more, he that hath seen the Son hath seen the Father moreover.
