 |
| @page { margin: 2cm } p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; line-height: 120% } a:link { so-language: zxx } |
 |
| @page { margin: 2cm } p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; line-height: 120% } a:link { so-language: zxx }
Sri Ramakrishna
|
 |
| @page { margin: 2cm } p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; line-height: 120% } a:link { so-language: zxx }
Sri Ramakrishna
|
@page { margin: 2cm } p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; line-height: 120% }
This the universe does not come out of atoms: they may be the secondary or the tertiary state. The primordial material may frame into molecules and become grosser and greater things; and to the extent present-day examinations go, they rather point towards a similar end. For instance, in the modern theory of ether, if you say ether is atomic, it will not solve anything. To make it more clear, say that air is made out of particles, and we realize that ether is all over the place, interpenetrating, inescapable and that these air iotas are gliding, as it were, in ether. If ether again is composed of atoms, there will still be spaces between every two atoms of ether. What fills up these? If you suppose that there is another ether still finer which does this, there will again be other spaces between the atoms of that finer ether which require filling up, and so it will be regressus ad infinitum…So the atomic theory cannot be final. (CW.II.442) (Vaisesika view got refuted here)
//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
SRI RAMAKRISHNA TODAY 